Courtesy: Atty. Elaine Atienza
LAWYER Elaine A. Atienza, spokesperson for former Speaker Ferdinand Martin Romualdez, spoke briefly to reporters in an ambush interview but declined to disclose specific details regarding the case filed against Franco Mabanta and the Peanut Gallery Media Network (PGMN).
When pressed about whether the respondents have entered a plea, Atienza politely refused to give information, explaining that the legal team is under strict instructions not to discuss such matters publicly. She emphasized that both the status of the case and the supposed videos allegedly linking Romualdez to corruption are already part of ongoing proceedings, making it improper to share details outside the courtroom.
While keeping specific case details confidential, Atienza expressed full confidence in the evidence and legal position of Romualdez’s camp. “We are confident in the strength of our case and our evidence, and the court is the proper forum where we can test this evidence,” she stated.
She also confirmed that Romualdez himself was not present during the hearing but assured the public that he is properly represented by legal counsel. Should the court require his personal appearance or participation at any stage of the proceedings, Atienza said Romualdez will readily comply with all rules and orders.
Addressing claims that the filing of the case violates press freedom, Atienza clarified that the action is never meant to suppress the right of the public or media to report issues of public interest. “This is not about press freedom. In fact, we encourage people if they have anything against any person, they can report that to the authorities. But we should always follow the process,” she stressed. She also dismissed accusations that the evidence presented is fabricated, saying her side will not engage in arguments or speculative claims circulating on social media, and instead leave the assessment of facts to the proper authorities.
Atienza reiterated that the court, not social media platforms, is the right venue to settle disputes and examine evidence. She called on the public to be more discerning about information found online and wait for the official decision of the judiciary.
Furthermore, she reminded all parties involved—including personalities linked to PGMN—to observe the rules of court and refrain from making statements that could influence public opinion or prejudice the case. “We respect the court process and we trust that the court will view this matter fairly,” she added.
