HOUSE Committee on Good Government and Public Accountability chair Joel Chua of Manila
on Friday underscored that the issuance of subpoenas in the impeachment proceedings is a routine and lawful exercise of congressional authority, stressing that it is “standard, lawful, and part of accountability—not harassment.”
Chua, a member of the House Committee on Justice, firmly anchored the move in the powers granted under House rules.
“The House Committee on Justice is well within its powers in issuing subpoenas,” Chua said, noting that “all House committees are vested with this authority under the rules.”
He emphasized that subpoenas are a “standard legal tool used to secure and complete documentary and testimonial evidence,” and are part of ensuring that the record is thorough, verified, and procedurally sound.
Chua pushed back against claims that the issuance of subpoenas amounts to political pressure, stressing that the process is rooted in due process and evidence-based proceedings.
“The issuance of subpoenas is part of due process,” Chua said. “It strengthens the evidentiary record and ensures that findings are supported by complete and verified information.”
“This is about establishing the full factual picture—not targeting any individual,” he added.
At the same time, the Manila lawmaker warned against using the panel’s powers as a pretext to avoid participation in the proceedings.
“The lawful exercise of subpoena powers should not be mischaracterized as a reason to evade the process,” Chua said. “Accountability cannot be sidestepped by questioning procedures that are firmly grounded in law.”
He stressed that holding public office entails openness to scrutiny, especially in a constitutionally mandated process such as impeachment.
“Public office demands transparency and a willingness to face scrutiny,” Chua said.
Chua also pointed out that the proceedings provide a proper and formal venue for the vice president to address the allegations against her.
“The proceedings offer the vice president a fair platform to respond to the evidence on record,” he said. “If there are defenses to be raised, the trial is precisely where they should be presented.”
He cautioned that refusal to engage may only leave serious issues unresolved.
“Non-participation leaves material questions unanswered,” Chua said.
Reiterating the institutional role of the chamber, Chua said the House is simply carrying out its constitutional duty.
“The House is performing its constitutional duty in the impeachment process,” Chua said. “Respecting the process is part of upholding the rule of law and our democratic institutions.”
“This is not harassment—this is the House doing its job,” Chua added.
